Quantcast
Channel: Wall Street
Viewing all 5974 articles
Browse latest View live

The White House Is Hosting A Big Fiscal Cliff Meeting And Wall Street Isn't Invited

$
0
0

blankfein and dimon

President Obama will be meeting with top business executives on Wednesday to talk about resolving the "fiscal cliff." 

However, Politico's Ben White points out that Wall Street wasn't invited.   

From Morning Money:

The list for Wednesday’s CEO meeting with President Barack Obama on the fiscal cliff does not include a single banker and only one person — Kenneth Chenault of American Express— from the financial services industry. Chenault is a fixture at these White House meetings, which have amounted to little more than photo ops in the past. 

Wall Street bank execs including Goldman's Lloyd Blankfein and JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon have been vocal about addressing the fiscal cliff issue.

White also points out that it seems odd to not have bank execs who can talk about the implications the fiscal cliff would have on the financial markets. However, a White House source tells White that this will not be the only meeting with executives. 

Here's the list of who will be attending: 

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


A Small Group Of Goldmanites Are About To Experience A Life-Changing Event — Here's What They Can Expect

$
0
0

Lloyd Blankfein Gary Cohn

Tomorrow Goldman Sachs will tap its next "partnership managing director" class. 

The bank is expected to pick around 70 new partners, according to the Wall Street Journal.  That's significantly lower than the 110 tapped in 2010. 

All that means is that an already exclusive club is even harder to get into — becoming a partner at Goldman is one of the most highly coveted titles on The Street. 

Here's what we know about being a Goldman partner: 

  1. It's an intense two-year process to pick the partners: Partners are selected every two years in an extremely secretive process called "cross-ruffing" (it comes from the card game bridge).  Cross-ruffing is where a candidate is intensely analyzed by current partners and other bank employees on whether or not they deserve the partnership.  There are no interviews, according to Reuters' Lauren Tara LaCapra.
  2. Lloyd Blankfein personally calls you with the news: Reuters reports that either Lloyd Blankfein or Gary Cohn will give the banker a call to let them know they've made partner. Those who didn't make the cut are told the day before. 
  3. It's supposed to be an incredible feeling: One former partner told eFinancial News, "Don’t tell my wife this, but being made partner was the greatest moment of my life."
  4. Being a partner means getting a nice paycheck: One of the biggest benefits of being a partner at Goldman is the lucrative paycheck.  Partners make a base salary of $900,000, according to the WSJ
  5. They get a large chunk of the bonus pool: In addition to the base salary, about 20% of the bank's bonus pool is divvied up amongst the 400-plus Goldman partners, according to two former Goldman employees.
  6. There are other perks, too: Back in 2010, the New York Times' Susanne Craig reported that partners are given access to investment opportunities not available to the other employees.  They would also get tables reserved for them at high end New York restaurants.  
  7. It's a great way to get to the C-Suite: Being a partner can give someone an "inside track to the top jobs" at the bank, according to the NYTimes.  
  8. Or to a higher position off Wall Street: Not only could being a partner lead to the C-Suite at Goldman, but think of the possibilities off The Street.  For example, Hank Paulson, who became partner in 1982 and later served as CEO from 1999 to 2006, went on to become the Treasury Secretary. 
  9. Partners can be 'de-partnered': That being said, the bad news is you can be stripped of your partnership in a process known as being "de-partnered,"according to the New York Times.  While many who have been de-partnered remain at the firm, most people wouldn't even know they've lost that status and the nice bonus that comes with it, the report said. 

We're definitely looking forward to meeting the new partner class tomorrow. 

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Goldman Partners To Be Revealed Any Minute Now...

$
0
0

lloyd Blankfein

It's partner day at Goldman Sachs

This morning, the bank is expected to tap 70 new "partnership managing directors", according to the Wall Street Journal. That's a much smaller class compared to the 110 tapped in 2010.

Phone calls from Lloyd Blankfein and Gary Cohn letting the bankers know they've made partner should happen around 8:30 a.m. ET, according to Reuters

Those who didn't make the cut were informed yesterday.

Goldman partners are picked during a very intense and secretive two-year selection process.  

To be made partner is seen as a very, very big deal. 

One former Goldman partner told eFinancial News, "Don’t tell my wife this, but being made partner was the greatest moment of my life.

Best of luck, everyone! 

SEE ALSO: A Small Group of Goldmanites Are About To Experience A Life-Changing Event -- Here's What They Can Expect > 





Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Some Bank Of America's Equity Sales Team Are Faking Client Meetings To Make A New Quota

$
0
0

Bank of America's equity sales team were told they must attend and log at least 30 client meetings a month, Bloomberg News Hugh Son reported.

That's a really high number, especially since they're basically chained to their desks during the trading day.

And because the bar is so high, some of the employees seem to be having trouble meeting the quota and are fudging their meeting logs ahead of year-end meetings and bonus time, the report said citing unnamed insiders. 

The salespeople were given this client meeting quota mandate back in August by Soofian Zuberi, the head of global equities distribution, the report said.  

The basic premise is to get them to interact more with clients in person instead of just phone calls and emails.

It's actually a really good idea to get face-to-face interaction with clients, but an average of 1.5 meetings per workday is a little much. 

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Why Some Bankers Are Privately Happy When Their Colleagues Get Laid Off

$
0
0

bankers

With layoffs hitting Wall Street left and right, you would think everyone in finance would be totally grim, right? 

Not so fast. 

A banker we spoke to recently didn't seem phased by it in private.  We asked him why.

The reason, the banker explained, is when he does a deal with his smaller team, it might mean a bigger share from the deal fees for him. 

"We don't need a whole army on a deal," he said. 

Now when banks make money, some of that money has to go to the shareholders and some to employees.

The point the banker is making here is actually really depressing.  

When times are good, you have more employees making more money and working on more deals. 

All this shows is how people are fighting for a piece of a shrinking pie.  

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

How To Talk Like An Investment Banker

$
0
0

charlie sheen wall street“Hahah, oh snap! That is hot. Get this though, the other day, this MD accidentally spills coffee on this analyst’s shirt. MD doesn’t really say anything, just goes on working. The analyst is moping around all day whining about his shirt. So finally, the MD drops $100 bill on the analyst’s desk and goes ‘Quit whining and just go buy yourself a new shirt if it’s that big a deal.’ So the analyst is all happy because he got the POS at Marshalls for like $15. But then, the MD says ‘But I own that shirt now, give it to me’ and makes the analyst give him the shirt go the rest of the day with no shirt!”

-MD’s, The Leveraged Sellout

Continuing our series in Investment Banking Lingo this week, we resume today with more essential vocabulary that any good banker must know to get ahead in today’s tough market.

Even Frank Quattrone had to learn the meaning of “Alt Tab” at one point or another (ok, maybe he was born knowing that one…).

Downtime

Typical usage:“I had some downtime today so I was catching up on American Idol.”

What it means for the Analyst: You get a break from staring at Excel and instead get to stare at your web browser.  Just make sure not to do anything too naughty, or your IT department may catch on and alert the authorities.

What it really means:There’s never a constant flow of work in investment banking.Some days are nightmares and other days you don’t really do much, get to go home early and even watch low-quality made-for-TV movies.  Since your workload is dependent on whenever the senior bankers get around to reviewing what you produced (general rule of thumb: “I need it by tomorrow” = “Will look at it in 2 weeks”), a lot of time is spent sitting around waiting.  And waiting.  And waiting…

Tips and tricks: The key to using downtime effectively is simple: don’t get caught. Whether it’s using Facebook 4 hours every day like a certain trader at Goldman Sachs, looking at uh, inappropriate sites, installing games or watching that episode of American Idol you missed, you must have a fast way to exit whatever it is you’re doing.  Be alert – don’t listen to blaring music – and avoid suspicion by browsing sites with mostly text.

Alt Tab

Typical usage:“I had some downtime today so I was catching up on House…  VP almost saw me but luckily I Alt Tabbed out of it really quickly!”

What it means for the Analyst: Alt Tab is your lifeline.  Bankers are pretty good at Excel, but we’re actually much better at hitting Alt Tab just before someone notices that we’ve been watching Grey’s Anatomy for the last hour.

What it really means: For those who haven’t yet entered the work world and learned the wonders of Alt Tab, it is a shortcut to quickly switch the visible program on your computer.  So if you have Excel and YouTube open at the same time, hitting the Alt and Tab keys at the same time will rapidly switch between the two.  Brilliant.

Tips and tricks: Alt Tab can be used successfully only when you have advance warning.  If someone pounces on you and sees you looking at Dealbreaker or Leveraged Sellout, it’s all over.  So make sure you don’t listen to blaring music, and try to position yourself in your cube so that you can see any incoming enemies and intercept them with Alt Tab.

Staffer

Typical usage:“Just walked by the Staffer’s office… he saw me and now my weekend is completely screwed.”

What it means for the Analyst: Let’s just say that if you were Spiderman, the Staffer would be Dr. Octopus.  The staffer is your arch-enemy.  He or she can end your life with a single sentence.  Avoid the Staffer at all costs and certainly don’t be anywhere near his/her office on Friday at 4 PM.

What it really means: The Staffer assigns work to Analysts and makes sure work is distributed evenly (theoretically, anyway).  This is one of the most un-wanted jobs at an investment bank, and usually only the most extreme sadists dream of one day becoming the Staffer.  The Staffer is usually an Associate or senior banker who handles this responsibility in his/her “spare time.”

Tips and tricks: Avoid the Staffer on Fridays.  You can try to befriend it, but such beasts are rather difficult to tame, so avoiding it and always looking busy is probably the best strategy.  Just make sure you always have a good explanation for why you’re so busy – the Staffer is a cunning demon and can see through the thin lies you tell.

Closing Dinner

Typical usage:“Sweet!  Closing dinner on Friday in Vegas.”

What it means for the Analyst: Relief.  The Closing Dinner happens after a deal closes and is a celebration for everyone involved.  Usually the finest restaurants, the finest wine, and yes, the finest models and bottles are involved.

What it really means: See above.  It’s a big celebration after a deal closes and you usually get to go to an exotic location (or it could just be Vegas), eat $1,000 dinners and drink ambrosia from the hands of the gods.  And the best part: you’re not paying for it.  It’s one of the most fun nights you’ll have as an investment banker.

Tips and tricks: DO NOT GET DRUNK.  Trust me on this one.  No matter how tempting it is, do not get drunk in front of your entire team and start telling stories of all your crazy youthful adventures.

DD

Typical usage:“Deal is taking awhile… their DD never ends.”

What it means for the Analyst: Waiting and sometimes formatting a company’s financials and other information so you can “add value” before sending them to the buyer.  But mostly waiting to see whether or not a deal is going to happen or not.  Sometimes you get to pretend you’re a consultant too, and you travel to wherever the buyer/seller are located.  Just hope it’s not Alaska in February.

What it really means: Due diligence.  Finding out everything and anything possible about a company you’re going to buy.  This is what private equity firms and VCs do all day.  This is usually a faster process if it’s a financial buyer (private equity) rather than a strategic, where they actually hold onto it for a long time and are therefore quite careful.

Tips and tricks: Remove yourself from the process as much as possible.  If there’s an issue, blame it on your client.  You can’t audit every single bit of information they send over.  Sometimes this tactic doesn’t work so be careful or you might find yourself in the conference room waiting to hear your severance number.

MD

Typical usage:“I completely messed up the numbers in front of my MD… my bonus is gone.”

What it means for the Analyst: If the Staffer is your arch-enemy, the MD is the man behind the curtain.   The Wizard of Oz.  The one giving the orders but not directly ordering the Analyst around.  He has the power to fire or hire you, and he doesn’t play nice.  Be respectful but fearful.

What it really means: The Managing Director.  The top of the heap.  The king of the castle.  He makes rain and brings in deals and revenue for the firm.  The only people higher than the MD are Group Heads and the executives of the firm.  The MD is usually a lifelong, battle-hardened banker who has been through it all.

Tips and tricks: Don’t screw up.  If you do something wrong in front of an Associate or VP, that’s one thing, but screwing up repeatedly in front of the MD is one sure-fire way to assure yourself of a bottom-bucket bonus and no recommendations for those exit opportunities you’ve been dreaming of.

Just Wait, There’s Even More (Maybe)

Lingo is one of my favorite topics so expect to hear more about this one in the future.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

A Wall Street Analyst Took Some Gorgeous Photos Of New York Getting Pounded By Storms

$
0
0

SocGen FX analyst Sebastien Galy is one of our favorite follows on Wall Street for his short, sharp observations from the world of global macro and currency.

And in addition to all that, it turns out he's a great photographer. From his home in New Jersey he took some great shots recently of the recent weather, which he's let us run.

These menacing clouds were from September, when New York got hit by tornadoes.

New York storm

The night before Sandy hit..

new york storm

Sandy floodwaters...

new york hurricane sandy

Half of New York in the dark.

new york hurricane sandy

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

The New Scourge Of Wall Street — Finance Hipsters

$
0
0

Fucking hipsters

I'd like to take a moment to discuss the growing multitude of "finance hipsters" and why they annoy the crap out of me. No, I'm not talking about hipsters who happen to work in finance, I'm talking about all these bankers who love to hate on the more ubiquitous methodologies in finance like CAPM (or portfolio theory in general) and DCF models. You all know what I'm talking about, in fact, at some point, you (or someone you know) has probably had this conversation:

Banker #1:

I'm going to get the cost of equity using CAPM and then get the intrinsic value from my DCF model.

Banker #2:

Oh, you still use CAPM and DCF? Man, that's so déclassé, you know the assumptions they use, right? You should use [insert any obscure, probably firm specific model], it's way better.

Replace "the cost of equity using CAPM" and "the intrinsic value from my DCF model" with "Modest Mouse's new CD" or "non-organic milk" and you have the quintessential hipster conversation.

Are they perfect models? No, far from it, and "Banker #2" is right about the assumptions. But, both were huge leaps forward in analysis and deserve a bit more credit. To really appreciate this, it's important to understand what came before them:

Dow Theory: The predecessor to modern technical analysis was developed from 255 editorials written by Charles Dow. Imagine developing a financial theory from 255 of Paul Krugman's editorials, it would consist entirely of methods to purchase assets that reliably vote democrat and numerous footnotes on the awesomeness of inflation. Luckily, Charles Dow was a pretty smart guy so the resulting theory isn't complete and utter gibberish, but some of the 6 tenets of Dow Theory would strike most of you as pretty ridiculous (e.g. The Market has Three Movements.)

Head over to Wall Street Oasis to read the rest of this post>

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Goldman Promotes 266 To Managing Director

$
0
0

Lloyd Blankfein

Yesterday Goldman Sachs named 70 of its employees to the highly-coveted "partnership managing director" position

Today the bank promoted 266 employees to managing directors.

That's slightly higher compared to when the bank promoted only 261 to managing director last year making it the smallest class ever. 

In 2010, there were 321 managing director promotions. 

Anyway, congrats to all of them.

Here's Goldman's release

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS) today announced that it has selected a new class of Managing Directors, effective from January 1, 2013, the start of the firm’s next fiscal year.

“The dedication and leadership of this group represent the best of Goldman Sachs, and we wish our new Managing Directors continued success,” said Lloyd C. Blankfein, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs.

The following individuals have been promoted to Managing Director:

Zachary T. Ablon
Reyhaan Aboo
Jeff Albee
Carlos Albertotti
Shahzad Ali
David E. Alvillar
Timothy Amman
Lucia Arienti
Jacqueline Arthur
Willem Baars
Nilesh Banerjee
Michael Bang
Marc Banziger
Yibo Bao
Vlad Y. Barbalat
Tanya Barnes
Melissa Barrett
Dan Bennett
Alyssa Benza
Bruce Berg
Dinkar Bhatia
Meera Bhutta
Matthew G. Bieber
Keith Birch
Kerry Blum
Tim Boddy
Matteo Botto Poala
Ryan Boucher
Joseph Braik
Fernando Bravo
Chris Buddin
Paul H. Burchard
Caroline Carr
Marie-Ange Causse
Daniel Cepeda
Jean-Baptiste Champon
Raymond Chan
Rita Chan
Pierre Chavenon
Gigi Chavez de Arnavat
Angus Cheng
Nikhil Choraria
Adam Clark
Hugo Clark
Colin Convey
Piers Cox
Chris Crampton
Fredrik Creutz
Heidi Cruz
Angelo Curreli
Laurianne Curtil
Pol De Win
Matthew DeMonte
Anthony Dewell
Joshua A. Dickstein
Kuniaki Doi
Jessica Douieb
Martine Doyon
Jennifer Drake
Dexter D'Souza
David Dubner
Amy Elliott
Theodore Enders
Hugh Falcon
Aidan Farrell
Raymond Filocoma
Andrea Finan
Jeffrey Fine
James A. Fitzsimmons
Matthew Flett
Robert G. Frahm III
Alisdair Fraser
Barry Friedeman
Charlie Gailliot
Renyuan Gao
Manuel A. Garcia
Suzanne Gauron
Darren T. Gilbert
Jason Gilbert
Guillermo Gimenez
Eric Goldstein
Jamie Goodman
Betsy Gorton
Pooja Goyal
Jason Granet
David Granson
David Grant
Tim Grayson
Brian Greeff
Marci Green
Stephen Griffin
Kristen Grippi
Dinesh Gupta
Manav Gupta (Securities)
Yuhei Hara
Toshiya Hari
Todd Haskins
Aime Hendricks
Michael Henry
Peter U. Hermann
Alejandro Hernandez
James Herring
Jamie Higgins
Peter J. Hirst
Christopher Hogan
Mike Holmes
Jonathan P. Horner
Katie Hudson
Kenneth Hui
Lars Humble
Amer Ikanovic
Stephanie Ivy
Antoine Izard
Gunnar Jakobsson
Dong Soo Jang
James M. Joyce
John C. Joyce
Benjamin D. Kass
Christopher Keller
Simon J. Kingsbury
Judge Kirby
Jeffrey Klein
John H. Knorring
Marina Koupeeva
Jane Lah
Pierre Lamy
Arthur Leiz
Alex Levy
Alexander S. Lewis
Tim Li
Zheng Li (IBD)
Stephane Lintner
Ilya Lisansky
Darren Littlejohn
Jean Liu
John Liu
Wanlin Liu
Wendy Mahmouzian
Mazen Makarem
Daniel R. Mallinson
Thomas Manetta
Robert C. Mara III
Stephen Markman
Dunstan Marris
Jon May
Kristen McDuffy
Victoria McLean
Sean McWeeney Jr
Benoit Mercereau
Edouard Metrailler
Peter Michelsen
Samantha Migdal
Jeffrey Miller
Marko Milos
Teruko Miyoshi
Steven Moffitt
Sarah Mook
Hari Moorthy
Michael Moran
Paula P. Moreira
Alister A. Morrison
Peter Mortimer
Chukri Moubarak
Sara Naison-Tarajano
Anthony J. Nardi
Gleb Naumovich
Sean Naylen
Oliver Neal
Olaf Nordmeyer
Barry O'Brien
Patrick O'Connell
Zahabiya Officewala
Keisuke Okuda
Elizabeth Overbay
Robert A. Palazzi
Philip Pallone
Mitesh J. Parikh
Brian A. Pasquinelli
Nita Patel
Manolo Pedrini
Douglas Penick
David Perdue
Michael Perloff
Patrick Perreault
Alec Phillips
Marc Pillemer
Noah Poponak
Kim-Thu Posnett
Sameer Ralhan
Mo Ramani
Samuel Ramos
Andrea Raphael
Kareem Raymond
Neil Reeve
Claudia Reim
Grant Richard
Valentina Riva
Fernando Rivera
Brian Robinson
Tom Robinson
Javier Rodriguez (Operations)
David Roman
Katya Rosenblatt
Richard J. Rosenblum
Amanda Rubin
Bryan Rukin
Akshay Sahni
Gunjan Samtani
Lucas W. Sandral
Manu Sareen
Philip Saunders
Monika Schaller
Michael Schlee
Jonathan Schorr
Anton Schreider
Peter Schwab
Roy A. Schwartz
Joshua Schwimmer
Stuart Sclater-Booth
Kunal Shah
Martin Sharpe
Hao Shen*
Mark Siconolfi
Vanessa Simonetti
Amit Sinha
Matthew Slater
Ian Spaulding
Richard Spencer
Lesley Steele
Heiko Steinmetz
Michael Strafuss
Takashi Suwabe
Linda Tai
Laura Takacs
Maurice Tamman
Eng Guan Tan
Katsunori Tanaka
Bob Tankoos
Belina Thiagarajah
John R. Thomas
Cullen Thomason
Glenn Thorpe
Jonathan Tipermas
Michele Titi-Cappelli
Timothy G. Tomalin-Reeves
Carrie Van Syckel
Tammy VanArsdalen
Carmine Venezia
Frank Viola
Heather von Zuben
Monali Vora
Martin Walsh (Technology)
Ward Waltemath
Stephen Warren
Luke Wei
Matthew Weir
Chris Wells
Geoffrey M. Williams
Neil Wolitzer
Willie W. Wong
Nicola Wright
Makoto Yamada
Wendy Yun
Genya Zemlyakova
Jing Zhang**
Allen Zhao

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

REPORT: Regulators Are Going After JP Morgan For Being Soft On Money Laundering

$
0
0

jamie dimon hearing

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency will soon proceed with formal action against JP Morgan for having weak anti-money laundering systems, Dan Fitzpatrick and Robin Sidel of the Wall Street Journal report.

You may recall that both Standard Chartered and HSCBC (read the thrilling HSBC report here) have been investigated for the same weaknesses. In those cases, weak guards against money laundering resulted in funds allegedly being made available to terrorist groups, Mexican drug cartels and other criminal operations.

From WSJ:

The cease-and-desist order from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is part of a broader crackdown on the nation's largest banks, the people said...The OCC's message was delivered last Thursday and Friday to directors and executives from more than a dozen institutions.

U.S. banks are obligated under the Bank Secrecy Act to report to federal authorities any suspicious activity or cash transactions of more than $10,000. Banks also must have elaborate systems designed to detect criminal activity within their networks. Failure to comply can lead to penalties or prosecution.

The WSJ also reports that JP Morgan has been in talks with regulators the terms of this action for some time.

JP Morgan has been embroiled in a few scandals this year. The $6 billion London Whale trading loss stands out most, but the bank is also being sued for fraud because of mortgage-backed securities sold by Bear Stearns (which was bought by JP Morgan during the financial crisis).

We'll let you know more when we have it.  

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

A Former Hedge Fund Manager Breaks Down How Wall Street Uses Its Favorite Tax Loop

$
0
0

monopoly man rich

I wrote last week that one of the great lessons of the recent Presidential campaign, for me, is how little we as a country understand income tax policy.

Since we’re about to engage in a crash course in fiscal policy[1] it’s worth focusing on the loophole of carried interest.

Both Presidential candidates referred in the debates to closing income tax loopholes, yet both were deathly afraid of mentioning anything specific, such as the egregious carried interest income tax loophole for hedge funds and private equity funds.  Romney skipped it because his entire Bain Capital career benefitted from it, and Obama skipped it because he’s derived a healthy portion of campaign funding from the same industry.[2]

Industry-specific loopholes like this always prove notoriously difficult to close, because benefits accrue to an intensely interested, knowledgeable, and well funded group, while the general public has minimal to no knowledge of the loophole, no voice at the table, and only earns a very diffuse benefit by closing the loophole.

If you don’t know what carried interest is, then you’re not particularly close to anyone in the hedge fund or private equity world.  Frankly, that is the way we in the investment world would like to keep things.  You – in the dark.  Us – avoiding taxes.

However, as a recovering fund manager dedicated to a fearless moral inventory of all things financial, I’ll explain what you’ve been missing by telling my story.

How I tried, ignorantly, to forgo my right to an awesome loophole

When I set up my private limited investment partnership – also called, inaccurately, a hedge fund[3]– my attorney insisted I set up not one additional Limited Liability Company in Delaware, but rather two.  I tried to resist him, saying I felt most comfortable with just one new business entity.[4]  I was so averse to two new entities that I asked another attorney for a second opinion.  He told me the same thing.  I needed two entities.  I asked my accountant.  His response was, of course, “two entities,” and complete puzzlement at my resistance.  Clearly, they knew something that I didn’t.  That something is the awesomeness of the carried interest loophole.  Needless to say, I got the extra LLC.[5]

Two types of income require two entities

Why did my attorney and accountant insist I create a separate entity?  Because that separate entity can collect payments in the form of ‘incentive allocation,’ also known as ‘carried interest,’ which is taxed advantageously, at the same rate as long-term capital gains[6] rather than as ordinary income.  Here’s how it works.

If you set up a traditional hedge fund[7], first things first: you’ll want to charge the traditional “2/20.”[8] Embedded in this short-hand lingo of “2/20” for hedge fund fees are two types of income.

With the two types of income, you need the two entities to keep the income tracked separately.  Entity #1 collects the “2,” which is taxed like regular business income, and Entity #2 collects the “20,” which collects your totally awesome income at a lower tax rate.

The “2” refers to an annual management fee of 2% of assets under management.  On a small/medium-sized hedge fund of, for example, $500 million under management, you will collect $10 million in management fees per year.  The purpose of this money is to pay for rent, staff, overhead, technology, research – in short all the things you need to do as a fiduciary for the proper care and feeding of the client’s money.  This management fee income will net out with business expenses, and may or may not ever generate “profit” for the manager.  In some fundamental sense, it’s not supposed to generate profit; hedge fund managers are fine earning zero profits from management fees since the $10 million is taxed like ordinary income at 35%, which is, as you know, kinda lame.

The “20” refers to the incentive allocation, meaning specifically that 20% of all annual gains are retained by the manager, in entity #2, as ‘carried interest.’  Here, the hedge fund manager takes full advantage of the loophole.  If the $500 million fund has a gain on investments of 10% this year, fully 20% of the $50 million gain on investments – that is to say $10 million – gets earned by the hedge fund manager’s entity #2 as the ‘incentive allocation’ or ‘carried interest.’

At this point, that ‘carried interest’ gets treated at the rate of capital gains, a 15% tax rate, rather than the 35% taxable rate of ordinary income.  Often, by design, the hedge fund manager leaves the entire 20% incentive allocation inside the fund for it to grow long term.  The manager only owes $1.5 million in taxes (15% of $10 million, at the capital gains tax rate) instead of $3.5 million (35% of $10 million, at the ordinary income tax rate).  As a result of the special tax treatment for ‘carried interest,’ the small/medium hedge fund manager in our example keeps $2 million more than he otherwise would have been entitled to keepThat’s a good deal, for him.

And that’s just one year.

And that’s just for kind of a small hedge fund.

You can imagine the bigger, scale-able results available for when a John Paulson-type fund manager scores  big by shorting the subprime mortgages market in 2007 (probably saved about $740 million in taxes with the loophole) or buying gold in 2010 (probably saved about $980 million in taxes with the loophole)[9]

You can also see why my attorneys and accountant insisted that I set up a separate entity that could take advantage of the tax loophole for carried interest.  My keep-my-life-simple approach made absolutely no sense in the face of potential millions in tax savings year after year.  And they knew that.

Is carried interest deserving of special treatment?

Is there anything special about ‘carried interest’ that justifies the preferred tax treatment?

Proponents argue that because much of ‘carried interest’ stays invested inside of hedge funds, still at a risk of loss, that additional risk justifies the 15% preferred tax rate.

But typically much of that ‘carried interest’ left in the market could be liquidated and taken out by the hedge fund manager anytime.[10]  (You know what else is risky?  Having a job, with a salary, that you could be fired from next week, but you have to pay a much higher tax rate on that salary.  That’s pretty risky too.)

Other proponents of ‘carried interest’ argue that tax policy should incentivize the accumulation of our economy’s scarce investment capital, basically the Ed Conard argument for lower taxes on wealth and investments.

In my opinion, that’s bunk.  Capital is not that scarce for any truly innovative segment of the economy.  Most hedge funds and private equity investments offer little value-added as innovative engines of the economy.  I know that’s my hypothesis, not a provable assertion, but I’ve seen enough on the inside to know – these hedge funds are not the engines of innovation you’re looking for.

At the end of the day, the ‘carried interest’ money is treated better than salary money because it’s been earned by a special class of people – hedge fund and private equity fund managers – who are much more influential in the political process than the average worker.  Full stop.

All of this is why I wrote last week that I would appreciate it if both sides of the political aisle would just stop lying to us about fiscal policy and loopholes and treat us like adults.  I’m ready to be pleasantly surprised.  But I’m not going to turn blue holding my breath.

 


[1] Thanks to the overheated discussion of a completely politically synthetically created crisis known as the Fiscal Cliff.

[2] Don’t be overly misled by some of the anti-Obama rhetoric from titans of the hedge fund industry like Omega’s Leon Cooperman.  Despite Cooperman’s choice comparisons to Nazism, or Dan Loeb saying Obama’s treats them like ‘battered wives,’ hedge fund and private equity managers know that Obama’s been all talk and no action when it comes to what they really care about.  Which is the carried interest loophole.

[3] A pet peeve of mine as well as for many people in the industry, the use of the term ‘hedge fund’ to describe what is better described as a ‘private investment limited partnership.’  ‘Hedge fund’ implies something that has no relation to my business.  I did no hedging.

[4] My reason at the time was that as a small business, I wanted to keep things simple.  A new entity meant the additional cost of entity creation and maintenance, a separate set of accounting books, a separate set of tax returns, etc.  Boy was I wrong about the potential costs and benefits, as I’ll explain below.

[5] Here’s a handy rule of thumb for non-financial people:  Whenever you see a company or business situation with lots and lots of separate business entities, you can be confident there’s tax avoidance going on.  It’s possible there’s also an attempt to shield the principals from bankruptcy, but it’s either that, or tax avoidance.  Anyway, just an FYI.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

JP Morgan Will Pay $297 Million To Settle SEC Mortgage Fraud Lawsuits

$
0
0

This just in from Bloomberg. JP Morgan will pay $297 million to settle a lawsuits related to mortgage backed securities.

Earlier today Reuters reported that the bank had reached an agreement with the SEC, but did not disclose how much JPM would pay.

From Reuters:

One of the cases is related to disclosures by JPMorgan of delinquencies involving one mortgage-backed securitization. The other case is over multiple securitization done by Bear Stearns, the failed investment bank that JPMorgan took over in March 2008 during the financial crisis.

The company faces numerous other government investigations and private lawsuits stemming from the financial crisis and from its $6.2 billion trading loss this year on credit derivatives.

On to the next.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

How I Made It From The Back Office To The Front Office At A Hedge Fund

$
0
0

fireworks

If you’re working in the back officeat a hedge fund right now, congratulations!

You should rip open your Oxford shirt and be proud of your monogrammed B.O.B. club t-shirt (the acronym stands for “Back Office Beefcake” – Brian and I are still ironing out intellectual property details, so for now, just write your name and B.O.B. on an old gym shirt and wear it to work).

Feeling good? Excited about your career trajectory and exit opportunities? Fantastic!

Now settle down before someone sees you.

If you actually stood up and loudly professed your adoration for working in hedge fund operations, go to the nearest kitchen, find a glass, fill it up with reality, and take a long sip.

Your life may not be over, exactly, but you need to play your cards right or you’ll be stuck in the back office forever – almost like what happened to me, before I escaped the insanity.

What In The Hedge Do You Actually Do?

I’m sure you already know all about the front office vs. the back office, so let’s not repeat all that here.

In short: if you earn revenue, research how to make it, trade it, or directly manage it, you’re front office.

Pretty much anything with a two-letter acronym falls into this category: IB, WM, PE, S&T, HF, ER…

By contrast, “middle office” applies to any role that supports those people.

At hedge funds specifically, “middle office” refers mostly to accounting roles.

And the “back office” at a hedge fund is every role that supports the trading and accounting groups, such as Pricing, Cash & Collateral Management, OTC & Settlements, and so on.

Before you leave a comment with an elaborate explanation of why this is wrong, yes, at some funds the back office duties vary from what I’ve described here… this is just a general rule.

If your job description falls under the support areas I just described, find an old gym shirt and make some room to stamp “B.O.B” on the front.

When You Have Cable and Can’t Find Something Good To Watch…

You get depressed. When you get depressed, you start looking for jobs in hedge fund operations – especially if nothing in the front office worked out for you this time around.

While my description above might seem dire, don’t get too depressed: working in hedge fund operations may actually lead to an opportunity to work in the front office at a hedge fund.

In fact, that is exactly what happened to me.

Six years ago I was working in Tartarus, otherwise known as Buffalo, New York.

I had just completed the first year of an analyst program at a middle-market bank and I was absolutely desperate to get out of Buffalo.

As part of that desperate attempt to leave town, I ended up landing a support staff role with a new business that had just been acquired by JP Morgan.

At the time I actually thought this was a good idea for getting into a front office role at a bulge bracket bank… especially since the hedge fund that sold JPM this business continued to operate in the same physical space.

Time for a Promotion?

If you’ve ever worked at a fast food restaurant in your youth, you know that getting promoted from fries/burgers/tacos/mop duty to cash register is a HUGE deal.

Getting promoted from analyst to senior analyst in the back office is similar: yes, you just got promoted, but you still work in fast food.

If that’s your life’s aspiration, there is nothing wrong with it. But if you want more out of a career, you can’t stay behind the cash register waiting for preparation to meet opportunity.

So once I took this support role at JPM and realized that no matter how much I “got promoted,” I’d still be working in fast food, I decided to fix it by networking like there was no tomorrow.

I used everything at my disposal, including:

  • Internal analyst gatherings
  • General networking events in Greenwich, CT (HF capital of the world)
  • Hedge fund placement recruiters

And plenty more that I’m forgetting about right now.

All that networking led to a relationship with a recruiter who provided me with an unbelievable opportunity: an offer at a US-focused, long/short equity hedge fund.

It took a little over 2 years, but I found myself sitting in a front office analyst role rather than wilting in the back/middle office – or losing my youth among other tortured souls in the underworld.

Past Performance is Not an Indicator of Future Results

Before you get your hopes up here based on my transition, realize that it only happened to me, and it doesn’t happen often.

All the stars were in alignment: it was the right firm and the right geography, I had received the right training, and had the right instinct, preparation, and contacts.

And then my preparation unlocked the right opportunity, and “right opportunity” had a distant cousin named “dumb luck.”

But there are some distinct advantages to taking on a support role at a hedge fund – and ways to turn it to your advantage and use it to break into the front office:

1)      The Word “Hedge-Fund” Appears On Your Resume

Studies show that it takes less than 20 seconds for a recruiter to review one resume.

If you’re able to hand your resume directly to a recruiter, perhaps that buys you an extra 30 seconds.

No matter the job environment, there are so many applicants to be reviewed for any one entry-level analyst job that anything even remotely related is pretty much required for you to have.

Simply having the word “hedge fund” on your resume (or identifying the business you work for if you don’t work for a prominent fund) or industry-specific jargon can help you get past this initial screening.

Always dress for the job that you want, not the job that you have.

In this case, “dressing” your resume up to highlight how your back office skills are relevant for the front office role you’re applying for is crucial.

And remember that unlike with investment banking, where the back and middle office have little to do with front office skills, it’s quite different on the trading / hedge fund side, which takes me to point #2…

2)      Being Around Traders, You Pick Up A Few Things

If you’re fortunate enough to sit in close proximity to the trading desk, always look for every opportunity to engage traders about the market, the asset classes that they trade, the economic environment, and even general financial news.

There’s a fine line between “stalking” and “inquiring” so focus on trader(s) who don’t mind talking with you from time to time.

Over time you’ll get better and better at thinking critically about the markets, financial instruments, and pertinent economic news.

Traders generally make good coin because they’re intelligent, resourceful, and execute well under pressure.

If you don’t possess those character qualities, you probably won’t succeed in any front office role, at least not on the public markets side.

Not to mention that if you are given an interview for a front office position, you will be less than ill-prepared.

3)      Don’t Take Your Support Staff Background For Granted

Remember that back and middle office roles are more relevant to traders than they are to bankers because trade settlement, risk management, and other roles are important to the actual business of making money.

Accounting is a building block of any business. Pricing is a critical component of any trade book. And Purchase & Sales serves as an important link between traders and support staff.

In a hedge fund environment, all of those areas have to work cooperatively and each area can offer tremendous insight into understanding trade value, trade positions, and general trade strategy. 

The more proficient you are in the support area that you work in, the easier it will be to create strong relationships with members of the portfolio management team, trading team, and other “front office” staff.

So it’s not nearly as much of a stretch to wander over and chat with people in the front office as it might be elsewhere – most hedge funds are small, anyway, and traders and investment analysts are more likely to at least partially understand the importance of your role.

4)      Somebody’s Been In Your Shoes Before – Find That Person

No need to reinvent the wheel – just find the blueprint.

There’s a strong chance that someone in a front office role at your fund did what you are trying to do right now.

While no two journeys are the same, you need to take similar steps to ensure similar results.

Go and find someone in the front office who worked elsewhere before, and find out how they advanced:

All these questions will give you insight into the nature and culture of your fund, and whether or not you can move up the ranks at that particular fund.

Sometimes it’s easier to get promoted if you simply move to another fund, and you want to figure this out early on so you don’t spend years in support roles.

5)      Slow and Hedgey Wins the Race

You can’t execute a plan without preparation, and if you plan to move from back to front office, you’re going to need a lot of preparation.

Oddly enough, sometimes taking on support roles actually gives you more time for preparation because you may not be working as much as the front office staff.

So you have more of a chance to:

  • Expand your professional network
  • Get a professional analyst designation
  • Explore other roles that move you closer to the front office

Sure, if you’re ambitious you don’t want to stay in “normal job” land forever… but if you’re already there, take full advantage of the benefits before writing it off entirely.

Your move to the front office won’t happen overnight, but with a calculated approach it can happen.

Just make sure you have an extra suit at the office for when that day finally comes – and you can cast off the shackles of your B.O.B. club t-shirt without remaining naked afterward.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

14 Photos Of Goldmanites Picking Up Trash

$
0
0

Goldman Sachers

Last weekend, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein spent the day volunteering The Rockaways with Sandy clean-up efforts. 

"He got after it.  He got filthy dirty.  He got down to his undershirt, it was soaked through with sweat.  He was refusing to take breaks.  He was refusing to take water and everything.  He was throwing around the heavy stuff.  He definitely didn't shy away," Jake Wood, the co-founder of Team Rubicon, told Business Insider

After Blankfein volunteered, the bank Tweeted out a picture of him looking like an Average Joe in his jeans, work boots and a t-shirt.  The photo definitely got people's attention because it showed a different side of Wall Street -- one that isn't just about making money.  

After Sandy hit, the Goldman pledged $10 million in relief funds consisting of a $5 million donation to clean up and recovery efforts and $5 million in loans to small businesses impacted the storm.  

In addition to the monetary support, the bank's employees have also participated in relief projects in New Jersey, Staten Island and The Rockaways packaging boxes of food and supplies and gutting out flood-damaged houses.  

BlankfeinYesterday, we decided to check out their relief efforts in The Rockaways. 

There, the bank has teamed up in a coordinated effort with Team Rubicon, a non-profit made up of military veterans and medical professionals to assist with disaster relief.  Team Rubicon has been managing the spontaneous volunteer response in The Rockaways and leading corporate groups such as Goldman.

Since Friday, November 9th, we're told that at least 300 Goldman employees have come through this area every day to help residents clean up their homes by removing furniture, carpeting, drywall, cupboards, etc. in flooded basements and garages before the rebuilding can begin.  What's more is Goldman's senior management and their families have been coming out to help, too.

"They're not afraid to get dirty.  That's for sure," Wood, a Marine veteran who served in Afghanistan, told us.

"In fact, some groups come in here that are a little more timid about getting the dirty, nitty-gritty of mucking out wet basements and stuff like that, but the Goldman group had no complaints.  Everybody's kind of loved it so far." 

Wood added that the Goldman team is also good because they show up on time, they stay the whole time and work hard.

Mike Hill and his daughterWhile we were checking out their work in The Rockaways, we met resident Mike Hill and his fourteen year-old daughter, Caitlyn.

The father and daughter ended up riding out the storm in their truck on an embankment while trying to cross the bridge to leave the area.   

Following the storm, Hill, his daughter, and his fiance and her family helped bring several residents in the area some much needed clothing (jackets, socks, underwear, sweatshirts, etc.).

He was surprised when he showed up with his daughter to clean up their home yesterday to see the Goldman team ready to help him and other neighbors.  

"Unbelievable.  It's just like good karma brings good fortune.  We helped some other people with clothing.  I came here today with one shovel and 32 bags and all the sudden we were descended upon by 15 volunteers.  They're gutting my house in a morning and an afternoon with what would take me probably weeks to do by myself. They're speeding the recovery of me and my family."

We're included photos of Goldmanites getting dirty picking up trash and debris: 

Goldmanites

Goldmanites

Goldmanites

Goldmanites

Goldmanites

Tearing down damaged sheet rock.

Goldmanites

Tearing out appliances that have been destroyed by flood waters. 

Goldmanites

Removing trash from one of the homes. 

Goldmanites

Shoveling up sheet rock. 

goldmanites

Helping this resident remove his flooded washer/dryer.

goldmanites

Here's the neighborhood where Goldman Sachs employees are helping gut out the houses so residents can begin to rebuild. 

Rockaways

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

BILL COHAN: Wall Street Is Still Getting Away With Telling One Gigantic Lie Over And Over Again

$
0
0

jerome kerviel

Former Wall Street banker turned journalist William D. Cohan has a sharp column on Bloomberg this morning about what he calls "Wall Street's Great Scapegoat Hunt."

It all comes down to one point. In scandal after scandal, Wall Street banks offer up one of their own to take the blame. It's normally a junior banker that the bank's say acted alone and independently.

Cohan argues that that is never really the case (from Bloomberg):

This is particularly troubling because Wall Street is similar to the military: There is no upside for anyone working in finance to do anything but to follow the orders given by the bosses. The idea of a “rogue trader” is really a myth. The goal at every firm is always to make more money in any way that is legally defensible -- by selling more mortgage-backed securities, by doing bigger and bigger mergers-and-acquisition deals or by making a larger and larger bet on the direction of an obscure debt index.

When things go well -- the firm lands a big underwriting or a high-profile merger or executes a profitable trade -- there is no shortage of people around to claim credit. Of course, when something goes terribly wrong -- see “Whale, London” or “Synthetic CDO, Abacus” -- the senior executives disappear from the scene faster than cockroaches when the light is turned on. In return, employees get paid more working on Wall Street -- without putting any personal capital at risk -- than they can at almost any other job on the planet...

Cohan continues the piece with examples — Societe Generale's Jerome Kerviel (the most indebted man in the world),Kweku Adoboli of UBS (in the middle of a nasty trial in London), and Goldman's Fabrice Tourre, of the Abacus scandal (studying at the University of Chicago and doing humanitarian work in Rwanda). The list goes on.

It isn't that these guys are completely innocent, says Cohan, it's that they're just following orders. Unfortunately, those orders come from a flawed system that is perpetuated any time one of these young bankers takes the fall for their superiors.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Why This Democrat Despises Barack Obama

$
0
0

monopoly man richEquality of rights and obligations, in people’s treatment under the law, is the very basis of democracy.

When our nation was founded, the slave states demanded ignoring this legal concept.

It therefore didn’t become part of our Constitution until 1868 when the 14th Amendment was added, which included the Equal Protection Clause requiring states to accord equal rights to everyone.

Since that time, the major Constitutional battles have extended the meaning, and scope, of that Clause, regarding women, homosexuals, small religions (or “cults”), etc.

Other remaining areas of Constitutional ambiguity focus upon equality of obligations, not just of rights.

However, any nation that fails to accord equal rights and obligations to all citizens, is a plutocracy; a rule of some legal category of people over another legal category of people. Therefore, to that extent, it is a dictatorship, by some, over others – not an authentic democracy.

A plutocracy has nothing to do with any natural hierarchy, such as parents having an obligation to serve basic needs of their children up to a certain age, nor to do with any other situation in which a dependency exists by nature instead of being legally imposed.

A plutocracy is precisely a legally imposed hierarchy; it is not a naturally imposed one.

For example, homosexuals dictating to heterosexuals would be no more natural than heterosexuals dictating to homosexuals; in a democracy, no law will grant either category of persons rights or obligations to the other category.

This is what freedom means: it means legal equality. It does not mean (as many conservatives think it means) capitalism. (For example, dictatorial capitalism is called “fascism,” and democratic socialism is called “progressivism,” or is called whatever other term one might apply to the ideology of legally egalitarian nations such as Denmark.)

Freedom means legal equality, and it exists only in democracies. That’s the reality, not the “patriotic” propaganda, such as one often hears spouted by conservatives.

Barack Obama has been imposing upon the United States a plutocracy.

A recent commentary by Robert Reich provides one clear example of Obama’s doing this. Headlining “Why BP Isn’t a Criminal,” Reich documents that President Obama (via his “Justice” Department) has been imposing legal obligations upon BP’s lower-level employees but not upon the top-level executives. It is precisely these executives who had set up and become wealthy from imposing the reward-system that caused those lower-level employees to produce the Gulf of Mexico blowout and its consequent deaths and destruction.

Indeed, on November 18th, the AP headlined “Defense Lawyers Say BP Rig Workers Are Scapegoats,” and quoted lawyers for one worker saying “No one should take any satisfaction in this indictment of an innocent man. This is not justice.” The entire chain of command above those workers were ignored by Obama’s “Justice” Department. That’s typical.

In Obama’s America, benefits go upward, and costs go downward. The rights go to the aristocrats, while the obligations go to their workers. Equality before the law is merely an illusion in Obama’s America. This is the basic take-away I derive from Reich’s superb essay.

There are other examples. On 2 October 2012, Bloomberg News headlined “Top 1% Got 93% of Income Growth as Rich-Poor Gap Widened,” and Peter Robison reported that, “The earnings gap between rich and poor Americans was the widest in more than four decades in 2011, Census data show, surpassing income inequality previously reported in Uganda and Kazakhstan,” both of which countries are well recognized to be plutocracies. The reason for this yawning gap is that when (Obama-appointed) Timothy Geithner structured the bailout of Wall Street, he insisted that future U.S. taxpayers be obliged to bail out the then-current bondholders in those bailed-out firms at 100 cents on the dollar, as if there were no “toxic assets” at all being held by those firms.

Shahien Nasiripour, at Huffington Post, bannered on 16 May 2011, “Confidential Federal Audits Accuse Five Biggest Mortgage Firms Of Defrauding Taxpayers,” and reported that the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development had carried out audits of Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Ally Financial, and found, in each case, that they had swindled the Federal Government. “The internal watchdog office at HUD referred its findings to the Department of Justice, which had to decide whether to file charges” under “the False Claims Act, a Civil War-era law crafted as a weapon against firms that swindle the government.”

All of “the audits conclude that the banks effectively cheated taxpayers by presenting the Federal Housing Administration with false claims: They filed for federal reimbursement on foreclosed homes ... using defective and faulty documents.” Yet again – as with Goldman’s Lloyd Blankfein, and with Countrywide Financial’s Angelo Mozilo – the Obama “Justice” Department was being challenged to prosecute banksters. And yet again, they refused.

Obama still hasn’t pursued even a single one of them. Basically, Obama’s team has held harmless the top executives and investors in the Wall Street firms who had structured their incentive-systems to reward the most the mortgage salespeople who deceived home buyers the most, and the bond-rating firms that deceived investors the most. This is what had ended up maximizing the bonuses for those top executives, so they did it.

And yet Obama has refused to prosecute any of these “control fraudsters,” as criminologist William K. Black calls them. The same plutocratic operation that Robert Reich documents to have been imposed by Obama on BP, was earlier imposed by him upon the Wall Street firms whose mortgage frauds, and defrauding of investors, had crashed the U.S. economy.

Unlike Mitt Romney and his plutocratic financial backers, Barack Obama does this sort of thing only because he respects plutocrats, not because he is one. He won’t gain financially by turning this nation into a banana republic. But whatever his motivation is, I despise him for continuing George W. Bush’s and the Republican Party’s turning this nation into no longer a democracy, but a plutocracy. He doesn’t have to do it; he just wants to do it, and this is despicable, in the view of this committed democrat.

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

JP Morgan Names Marianne Lake Chief Financial Officer

What Lloyd Blankfein Looks Like At His Desk

$
0
0

Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein sat down with CBS Evening News' Scott Pelley to talk about avoiding the so-called "fiscal cliff." 

He's been calling for leaders in Washington to work together toward resolving the fiscal cliff issue for quite some time now.

One thing that caught our attention during the segment was that CBS shot some b-roll (extra footage) of Blankfein using the phone at his desk.  He didn't appear to actually be talking to anyone on the other line.

Anyway, we've always been curious about what Blankfein's corner office at 200 West Street looks like and now we have a sneak peak at the contents on his desk (several family photos, a Blackberry being charged and a small TV playing CNBC). 

Blankfein's desk

SEE ALSO: Lloyd Blankfein Spent His Saturday Helping Hurricane Sandy Victims >

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

This Is The Most Important Part of The SEC's Complaint Against Hedge Funder Mathew Martoma

$
0
0

Florida hedge fund manager manager Mathew Martoma has been arrested in what people are describing as the most lucrative insider trading charge in history.

Martoma allegedly made $276 million trading on two pharmaceutical stocks, Elan Corporation and Wyeth, for his hedge fund, CR Intrinsic. CR Intrinsic is a unit of Steve Cohen's Connecticut hedge fund, SAC Capital.

The SEC alleges Martoma was able to get insider information on drugs being developed by Elan Corporation and Wyeth by talking to Ann Arbor Doctor Sydney Gilman, an 80 year old professor of neurology at the University of Michigan Medical School.

Gilman was overseeing the clinical trial of an Alzheimer's drug Elan and Wyeth were working on.

According to the SEC complaint, Gilman and Martoma were in communication throughout 2008. And when Gilman was selected to present phase II trial results of the drug in July, he immediately called Martoma to let him know about it.

From the complaint:sec martoma complaint

After the call, Gilman sent Martoma a Power Point presentation on the drug marked "Confidential, Do Not Distribute."

sec complaint martoma

The complaint goes on to allege that CR Intrinsic started trading on this information four days later and continued to do so until July 29, 2008. Those trades were kept secret and known only to the trader and the portfolio manager.

Here's how the trade worked out for CR Intrinsic, according to the SEC:

SEC complaint martoma

 sec complaint martoma

The SEC even put together a chart of the alleged ill-gotten gains.

sec martoma gains chart

So there you have it, CR Intrinsic's not-so-sophisticated alleged insider trading scheme.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

15 Of The Most Classic Trading Floor Pranks

$
0
0

traders

If you ever get the chance to speak to a veteran floor trader, you really should.

That's because they're likely full of incredible stories about the good (or bad) ole days on the floor. 

They'll probably tell you about the amazing sense of camaraderie on the floor and the epic pranks they used to pull on each other.    

"Every joke was invented down there," a retired NYSE specialist said.  

However, the humor has subsided in recent years.

"Fortunately, or unfortunately, you don't see those pranks anymore," another veteran floor trader told Business Insider

The reason for the pranks in the past, the trader explained, is that they helped everyone on the floor "blow off steam." 

"You can't be running at 100 percent all the time.  You need to break the tension and that's why on the floor, every floor, they'd have some sort of prank or joke," the trader told Business Insider. 

Now traders have to worry about lower trading volumes and what's going on in the eurozone.  

Another reason they're fewer pranks is that the NYSE emerged as a publicly traded company, meaning there are more sensitive eyes these days. The CME Group, which owns the Chicago Board of Trade and the New York Mercantile Exchange, is also publicly traded.

"We always had respect for what we did as a living -- it was just joking around.  Once we went public the world was watching," the trader said, adding, "Now it's strictly business once everyone went public. Everyone down here is holding the utmost respect." 

Veteran traders both in New York and Chicago from the NYSE, CBOT, NYMEX and AMEX told us about some of the classic pranks and jokes they used to pull back in the day. 

* If you have another trading floor prank, joke or story you would like to share, please send Julia an email at jlaroche@businessinsider.com.  

If you tripped and fell at the NYSE, they'd make it look like a crime scene.

Location: NYSE

The prank: Back when the floor of the NYSE was super crowded if a guy would fall down, others floor brokers and specialists would draw a chalk outline around him.  

 



A new broker at the American Stock Exchange would be given a fake stock to trade as part of their initiation.

Location: American Stock Exchange

The Prank: The entire AMEX floor would prank the newbie by giving them a fake stock to trade.  The entire floor would be on it and prevent the new broker from getting their order executed until the stock ran up five points.  Then the newbie's booth would make them sell it.  The crowd would block the new broker from getting their order executed until the stock ran down five points.

"The broker would not know what's going on. Then, all of the sudden, a hand would reach in and grab his collar of his shirt and rip it off and the crowd would cheer and he would now be considered 'one of us,'" former AMEX broker "Groucho" said.



If someone got engaged everyone would taunt them.

Location: American Stock Exchange

The Prank:"When someone got married, we took them outside and handcuffed them to a fire hydrant and then tossed anything and everything we could find -- ketchup, mustard, powder, flour. And actually we cuffed the bride-to-be alongside her future and did it to her also," former AMEX broker "Groucho" said.




See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Viewing all 5974 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>